<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Regret the Error &#187; st john&#8217;s telegram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/tag/st-johns-telegram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com</link>
	<description>Mistakes Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Questionable apology</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2005/03/07/questionable-apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2005/03/07/questionable-apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Silverman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Major Errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st john's telegram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regrettheerrorbook.com/uncategorized/questionable-apology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The daily newspaper in St. John&#8217;s, Newfoundland ran an apology on page A6 this past Friday. While it said the paper &#8220;discovered several articles that contain plagiarized material,&#8221; and mentioned that the offending reporter was no longer working for the paper, it still fell way short of a proper apology. It says there were &#8220;at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.regrettheerror.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/telegram.thumbnail.gif" />The daily newspaper in St. John&#8217;s, Newfoundland ran an apology on page A6 this past Friday. While it said the paper &#8220;discovered several articles that contain plagiarized material,&#8221; and mentioned that the offending reporter was no longer working for the paper, it still fell way short of a proper apology. It says there were &#8220;at least&#8221; seven articles published that contained plagiarized material, but doesn&#8217;t list the articles, describe the plagiarized information, or note where the information was lifted from. It also doesn&#8217;t name the reporter that committed the offenses.</p>
<p>The apology:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Telegram would like to inform its readers that the newspaper has discovered several articles that contain plagiarized material.</em></p>
<p><em>After originally suspecting plagiarism in a story that was stopped by editors before publication, further investigation disclosed a pattern of </em><em>improper behaviour by an individual reporter who is no longer with the newspaper.</em></p>
<p><em>From the newspaper&#8217;s further investigation, it appears at least seven other instances of plagiarism occurred in unrelated stories, by the same </em><em>reporter, published over a period of several years. The information involved is background information that was copied verbatim from a </em><em>variety of websites and other sources over that time.</em></p>
<p><em>While the information was not necessarily inaccurate, it was not properly sourced, and constituted using the work of other writers </em><em>without attribution.</em></p>
<p><em>The Telegram regrets the misuse of this material.</em></p>
<p><em>We apologize to our readers.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2005/03/07/questionable-apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

