Tag Archives: new scientist

Hooray for gender inequality

newscientistWe mistakenly suggested that greater gender inequality increases the instance of female mathematicians in a country. Of course that should have been gender equality (6 June, p 7).

Link

Terawhat?

newscientistLet’s be clear: the rate at which sunlight delivers energy to the Earth’s surface should be expressed in terawatts. Our “For the record” of 25 April (p 25) not only contained a nonsense of its own (suggesting that a terawatt is different from a terajoule per second), but also failed to address our original blooper, in which we referred to terawatts per day (4 April, p 24). Link

Fuzzy numbers etc.

newscientist In “Surviving in a warmer world” (28 February, p 28) we said that “9 million people would need 18,000 square kilometres of land to live on”. That figure should, of course, have been 9 billion people, and the area of land 180,000 square kilometres. Link

Earth on the brain

newscientist Our review of two books on Islamic science wrongly described Copernicus’s solar system as geocentric, rather than heliocentric (21 February, p 46) – a confusion that might have saved Galileo a great deal of trouble. Link

Lessons in geography etc.

newscientistWe said that in 1709 “from Czechoslovakia in the east… everything turned to ice” (7 February, p 46). No such country existed in 1709. It was founded in 1918 and split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993. Link

A really nice sea lion

We accidentally referred to a “stellar sea lion” (29 November, p 6). The featured mammal is a Steller’s sea lion. Link

Trial and error

We mistakenly reported that all 59 people who received a new treatment for their inoperable brain cancer had died (4 October, p 16). We are pleased to report that several patients in the trial by Transmolecular of Cambridge, Massachusetts, are still alive. Link

A correction, but no free ad

A diagram on our Technology page claimed: “The US has more than twice as many wireless internet hotspots as any other country” (17 May, p 25). This was unfounded. The figures on which it was based were for hotspots registered with one commercial organisation, which isn’t going to get a free ad out of us. Link

A man of many interests

Feedback said that Darren Wright, of the project to beam biscuit adverts to aliens, is an astronomer (5 July). He is a lecturer in radio and space plasma physics who lists his research interests as “Things”. Link

Fuzzy numbers etc.

We said that Australian companies “forecast spending $800 between 2002 and 2013 on geothermal exploration” (19 July, p 24). That should have been $800 million. Link

Rest is fine

In the article “Alps are no go without snow” we said the measurement stations are between 200 and 1800 metres above snow level: that should have been above sea level. The study counted snow days, not snowfall; and the 60 per cent decline was for the Swiss plateau between Zurich, Bern and Basel, and not the Swiss Alps. Link

Gender issues

Our apologies to Yianna Lambrou of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization for referring to her as “he”. Link

Totally wrong

The UK Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment found no excess cancers within 25 kilometres of nuclear plants. Because of an editing mistake, our story “Nuke-plant leukaemia link?” conveyed exactly the opposite. Link

Technology is incredible

We described Weta Digital as “giving Gollum a voice that sounded human”. Gollum’s words were spoken by the human actor Andy Serkis. Link

Fuzzy numbers etc.

The “record-breaking crust” we mentioned in Greenland is 3.8 billion years old – not 1000 times younger, as we stated. Link