Newspaper circulation: An article in Business on Tuesday about newspaper circulation said the Oakland Tribune reported a 7.3% gain in circulation to 68,067. Those results were actually reported by the Oakland Press, in Oakland, Mich. The California paper reported a 0.3% gain in subscribers to 92,794. Link
Editor
What I'm Reading
- Journalism 2.0 | Mark Briggs Defining what's good in digital journalismJournalism 2.0 | November 5, 2009
- New York Times Goofs, Includes Editor's Internal Notes In iPhone News Article (NYT, AAPL)Silicon Alley Insider | November 4, 2009
- The Public Editor - Recession, Revolution and a Leaner Times - Op-Ed - NYTimes.comThe New York Times | November 1, 2009"Now, with an around-the-clock news cycle, reporters file throughout the day, and copy can be edited over a smoother cycle, she said. That is the goal, but the editing staff is dealing with much more copy than before, some online articles are now read by a single editor instead of four or five, and I hear regularly from readers complaining about errors in grammar, spelling and word usage."
- Reuters Editors Blog Archive Are we now too speedy for our own good? | Blogs |Reuters UK | October 27, 2009
- Newspapers want readers' help with Web credibility | Business news | Chron.com - Houston ChronicleHouston Chronicle | October 30, 2009
- Germany Looks at Ways to Protect Online Journalism - NYTimes.comThe New York Times | October 28, 2009
- The Future of Publishing? Trust and Curation, Says the Founder of Craigslist The Scholarly KitchenThe Scholarly Kitchen | October 26, 2009
- Bob Sutton: Reducing Interruptions and Saving Lives: New Study on Drug Treatment Errorsbobsutton.typepad.com | October 28, 2009Very good lessons here for journalists as well.
- 25 things journalists can do to future-proof their careers | Blog | EconsultancyEconsultancy | August 26, 2009
- CNBC: We're Not Going To Apologize For Blowing Friday's Microsoft News (GE)The Business Insider | October 26, 2009
- Journalism 2.0 | Mark Briggs Defining what's good in digital journalism
Accuracy Sites
Broadcast Corrections
Magazine Corrections
Newspaper Corrections
- Akron Beacon Journal
- Albany Times Union
- Arizona Daily Star
- Arizona Republic
- Asbury Park Press
- Associated Press
- Atlanta Journal-Constitution
- Austin American-Statesman
- Austin Chronicle
- Baltimore Sun
- Bangor Daily News
- Boston Globe
- Buffalo News
- Cape Cod Times
- Charleston Gazette
- Chicago Tribune
- Christian Science Monitor
- Cleveland Plain Dealer
- Columbus Dispatch
- Contra Costa Times
- Dallas Morning News
- Daytona Beach News-Journal
- East Valley Tribune
- Fort Worth Star-Telegram
- Fresno Bee
- Globe And Mail
- Greensboro News & Record
- Hartford Courant
- Honolulu Advertiser
- Houston Chronicle
- International Herald Tribune
- Kent State Stater
- Los Angeles Times
- Mail & Guardian (South Africa)
- Miami Herald
- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
- Minneapolis Star Tribune
- Minnesota Daily
- Mirror (UK)
- Monterey County Herald
- National Post
- New Orleans Times-Picayune
- New York Times
- Newsday
- Northwest Herald
- Orange County Register
- Orlando Sentinel
- Philadelphia Inquirer
- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
- Portland Press Herald
- Raleigh News & Observer
- Reuters
- Rocky Mountain News
- Sacramento Bee
- Salt Lake Tribune
- San Antonio Express-News
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Sarasota Herald-Tribune
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Seattle Times
- South Florida Sun-Sentinel
- St. Louis Post-Dispatch
- St. Petersburg Times
- Tampa Tribune
- The Gazette (Montreal)
- The Guardian
- The Independent (UK)
- The Oregonian
- Toronto Star
- U of Virginia Cavalier Daily
- Victoria Advocate (Texas)
- Virginian-Pilot
- Wall Street Journal
- Washington Post
- Washington Times
- Wichita Eagle
- Winston-Salem Journal
- Worcester Telegram & Gazette
Online Corrections
-
In the Summer 2009 issue of Science Activities (Volume 46, Number 2), our late executive editor was remembered as John McClure. The correct spelling of his name is John McLure. We regret the error and extend our sympathy to Dr. McLure’s family.
I can’t vouch for when this appeared in the Argus Observer, but it appears to be a legit scan of a correction:

Yesterday’s rave review of the new Star Trek film referred to the “hateful Klingon Nero” (Take it to the bridge, page 9, Film & Music). Numerous readers got in touch to say how very wrong this was. Here is an excerpt from one of the emails that corrected us in a stern yet graceful way: “Dear Guardian-shaped people, Uber-bad-guy (and part time CD burner) Nero is not a Klingon, he is a Romulan. I’m not normally picky about this sort of thing (which is, as you can probably tell, a complete lie) but he is referred to as a Romulan about a dozen or more times in the film, aside from the obvious giveaways like the lack of speaking in Klingon, and the absence of lumps on his forehead. Hope that helps.” ( Column editor’s note : apparently there are, disappointingly, no Klingons at all in this film. There is speculation that Romulan facility in time-travel is very useful not only to Romulans, but also to the sequel franchise . . . ). 