<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Regret the Error &#187; ITV central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/tag/itv-central/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com</link>
	<description>Mistakes Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Take pity on us for our incompetence</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/07/17/take-pity-on-us-for-our-incompetence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/07/17/take-pity-on-us-for-our-incompetence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Silverman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behind the scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITV central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=5542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Monck alerted me to a remarkable passage from a Press Gazette story about a court case against a British broadcaster. As background, the story reported that, &#8220;ITV Central &#8220;was fined Â£25,000 for contempt of court after it ran a news item about a trial which was about to start &#8211; and included details of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://adrianmonck.com/"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-5543" title="itvcentral" src="http://www.regrettheerror.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/itvcentral-300x82.jpg" alt="" width="99" height="27" />Adrian Monck</a> alerted me to a remarkable passage from a <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=41685&amp;c=1">Press Gazette story</a> about a court case against a British broadcaster. As background, the story reported that, &#8220;ITV Central &#8220;was fined Â£25,000 for contempt of court after it ran a news item about a trial which was about to start &#8211; and included details of a defendant&#8217;s previous conviction for murder.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s this:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>ITV Central told the court that it accepted that a basic and serious aberrational error occurred through publication of the report, but argued in mitigation that regard should be had to the fact that the error of revealing an accused&#8217;s antecedents before trial was so &#8220;blindingly obvious&#8221; that it had not anticipated that a trained journalist preparing a news report for broadcast would make such an error.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Quite the legal argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/07/17/take-pity-on-us-for-our-incompetence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

