Tag Archives: independent uk

How dare you suggest those boys weren’t drunk

independentIn the item “Jasper started it, honest” (18 October) about the Daily Telegraph’s recent feature on Tunbridge Wells it was wrongly suggested that Jasper Gerard had asked two boys of seventeen to pose for a fake picture showing them drunk, and that the paper had published it without their permission.

We are happy to make it clear that Mr Gerard did not commission the photograph nor was he present when it was taken and we apologise to Mr Gerard. The Telegraph also tells us the professional photographer who did take the picture insists that it was both authorised and genuine. Link

The lover, the nanny and the visa

independentIn the paper of 18 September we wrongly said David Blunkett had resigned from the Cabinet after trying to fast-track the visa application of his wife’s nanny. The nanny in question in fact worked for his lover and although Sir Alan Budd’s inquiry into the matter identified that the visa had been fast-tracked, it concluded “I have not been able to determine whether Mr Blunkett gave any instructions in relation to the case and if so what they were”. Link

Apology

independentIn our article, “Annie get your lawyer: Leibovitz sued over $24m loan” (1 August 2009) we quoted an anonymous source who said that Art Capital Group were ‘pretty scary guys, they are predatory lenders’. The article also included a statement from Annie Leibovitz’s publicist that the lawsuit brought by Art Capital Group is part of its continued harassment and attention-getting efforts. We accept that the allegations are false and apologise to Art Capital Group.’ Link

Independent (UK) falls down over “drinking bout” report

independentFurther to the reference in the paper on 14 June to Rebekah Wade allegedly hitting her first husband, Ross Kemp, after a "drinking bout" with David Blunkett, Mr Blunkett has been in touch to correct the record: "the alleged ‘drinking bout’ was a cup of tea at 5.30 in the evening (with witnesses including Rupert Murdoch)… There was no ‘drinking bout’, I’ve never been involved in such a ‘drinking bout’ – with or without Rebekah Wade". Link

Falling on his sword

independentIn today’s paper a reference to the wealth of Windsor Conservative MP Adam Afriyie was based on an email from his chief of staff, Russell Walters. Mr Walters has now told us he made a mistake in mentioning figures without discussing it with Mr Afriyie beforehand, for which he has now apologised to Mr Afriyie. Therefore, there was no "immodesty" on Mr Afriyie’s part. In addition, we are happy to make it clear that Mr Afriyie is not amongst those shadow ministers who are giving up external paid positions in advance of the disclosure deadline of 1 July. Mr Afriyie does not have any paid occupation outside the House of Commons. Link

 

Apology

independentIn our article, ‘Taboo-buster: the dark side of Jimmy Carr’ (18 November 2008), we wrote that Jimmy Carr’s mother had divorced his father seven years before her death.
We have been asked by Jim Carr, Jimmy Carr’s father, to correct this. They had an amicable separation but never divorced. Jim Carr has also asked us to make it clear that although, by choice, his youngest son, Colin, continued to live in the family home with his older brother Jimmy, Jim Carr continued to be financially responsible for, and was the only legal guardian of, his youngest son until that son reached the age of 18 some 3 years later, so it was misleading to write in the article that Jimmy Carr and his older brother ‘took on the responsibility of bringing up their younger brother’. We are pleased to do so and apologise to Jim Carr for the errors.
Link

All Muslims look alike (and the Independent is very sorry)

independentIn yesterday’s article in the print edition, ‘Britain’s least wanted’, by mistake we published a picture of D. Al-Boutti , instead of a picture of ‘Safwat Hijazi, televangalist’. Dr Al-Boutti is a highly reputable Syrian Muslim scholar and of course would not appear on a banned list. We apologize to Dr Al-Boutti for our error. Link

Sorry for saying you beat your girlfriend

independentThe High Court was informed on Wednesday (8 April 2009) that on 8 April 2007 we reported that EastEnders actor Mohammed George had attacked his girlfriend in the street and that she was the victim of violent domestic abuse inflicted by him.  We accepted in Court that Mr George’s police caution for common assault was for throwing a bag of rubbish at his girlfriend and that he has not been violent towards her or subjected her to domestic abuse.  We apologised to Mr George for the distress and anxiety that we caused him. Link

Apology

independentOur 19 January report of the West Ham v Fulham match (”Di Michele and Cole flourish in Bellamy’s place”) wrongly stated that Craig Bellamy had stormed out of training on 16 January. In fact, he attended training with West Ham in the normal way and made himself available for selection against Fulham. We apologise for any distress caused. Link

Wikiwhat the hell?

independentIn our article ‘Wikiworld’ (3 February 2009) we repeated several claims about Jimmy Wales, the Wikipedia founder: that he had a company that dealt in “soft porn” and was short-lived: that he had had to defend himself against “allegations from former colleagues that he used Wikipedia as a personal piggybank”: that he faced controversy over his age and “doctored his own Wikipedia entry to knock it down a couple of years: and that there had been speculation and board in-fighting about Wales’s relationship with the organisation. Jimmy Wales has pointed out that we repeated allegations which have no truth and we apologise to him for this. Link

Also see this Wikipedia-related error.

Michael Bywater would like to apologize for everything

independentRoy Greenslade spotted an amusing apology in the letters section of the Independent (UK). It’s written by the author of this Independent article:

Salman Rushdie: an apology
In my essay on the apology culture (12 February) I wrote, in the heat of the moment, that Sir Salman Rushdie went to Oundle. I now realise that Sir Salman went to Rugby. I wish to apologise unreservedly to Sir Salman for any offence the word “Oundle” may have caused him. I also wish to apologise to people who went to Oundle, for suggesting that being said to have gone to Oundle when in fact you went to Rugby might be offensive.
I also wish to apologise unreservedly to Rugby School, its staff, pupils and alumni, for suggesting that Sir Salman Rushdie was an old boy of an entirely different school. Finally, I wish to apologise to Eton, Harrow, Winchester and any other notable British school to which Sir Salman might have gone had his parents not decided on Rugby.
I also wish to apologise for a slip of the keyboard, so that I referred to Islam’s disparate “oral theologies” not “moral theologies”, which was what I meant. I should apologise, too, for . . . Oh, to hell with it. Everyone: I apologise for everything.
Michael Bywater
Cambridge

Also notable is the letter published underneath Bywater’s:

Michael Bywater should apologise for writing, “Your a twat”, a phrase I find particularly offensive. It’s “You’re a twat.” Idiot. (Sorry.)
Eccy de Jonge
London WC1

Apologies

guardian1Hanif Malik: In 7/7 bombers got Children in Need money (20 August, page 8) we reported that funds given by BBC’s Children in Need to the Leeds Community School Charity were fraudulently passed on to a neighbouring bookshop, where two of the London bombers worked, to fund their radical Islamist propaganda and for terrorist training purposes. We fully accept the assurance of Leeds Community School’s founder, Hanif Malik, that no Children in Need money was passed to the bookshop or the bombers nor was it used to pay for any propaganda or for terrorist training purposes. We apologise unreservedly to Mr Malik for the upset and distress caused. Link

independentIn our article “7/7 bombers ‘used cash from Children in Need’” (20 August 2008) we said that money from the BBC Children In Need Appeal, given to the Leeds Community School charity, was improperly channelled to the neighbouring bookshop where two of the London bombers worked. We accept the assurance of the school’s founder, Hanif Malik, that no money from the Children In Need Appeal was passed to this bookshop nor to the bombers, nor was any used to pay for propaganda. We are happy to set the record straight and apologise to Mr Malik for any distress caused. Link

Headline, not quote

independentIn the article about Jonathan Ross, ‘So, did anyone miss him?’ (14 January 2009), we wrote that Mark Lawson had told the Radio Times that Ross should “‘Ship Out!’. In fact this was the headline of the Radio Times article but was not a quote from Mark Lawson. Link

A bit different

independentA news in brief item on 9 January referred to the politician Imran Khan who was speaking to the court from Pakistan by video link during the trial of two London-based Baluchi defendants who deny charges of assisting terrorism. We have been asked to point out that Mr Khan was giving evidence as to the security and political situation in Pakistan, and that he did not “defend terror suspects” but in fact told the court that in his view there was “no place for terrorism in a civilised society”. Link

PCC finds Independent article “contained far too much [gory] detail and had not been sufficiently edited.”

independentThe Press Complaints Commission has upheld a complaint against the Independent. Here’s the finding, as published by the paper:

The Press Complaints Commission has investigated whether an article published on The Independent website under the headline “Chainsaw death was ‘carefully thought through suicide’”, contained excessive detail about the method of suicide used in breach of Clause 5 (Intrusion into grief or shock) of the Code.
The Commission found a breach of the Code.
The article reported the suicide of a man, who had taken his own life using a chainsaw.
The article contained a long and graphic reference to the method of suicide. It set out the precise apparatus that had been constructed by the individual to enable his death.
The newspaper amended the wording of the article as soon as the concern was brought to its attention by an interested party, removing all the detail.
Decision: Upheld
Adjudication:
Clause 5 (ii) was introduced specifically to prohibit the inclusion of detail that would act, in effect, as a blueprint for the method of a suicide. It is crucial that newspapers abide by its terms,in order to minimise the risk of copycat suicides. This means that, particularly in inquest reports (many of which will be provided by external agencies), care needs to be taken in the editing process to remove excessive detail.
On this occasion, the online article contained far too much detail and had not been sufficiently edited. It was a matter of concern that the newspaper had allowed the material to be published on its website. The Commission expected that the situation would not be repeated, as this was a clear breach of the Code.

Apology

In her column, “These bigots imperil our nation’s future” (29 September 2008) Yasmin Alibhai-Brown referred to Sir Andrew Green of Migrationwatch in discussing the British Council’s report on British and Italian young people’s views on national identity and Europe. She alleged that Sir Andrew is “gleeful” that the results showed that one in four Britons is fearful of migrants and that this outcome is the result of his campaigning. These allegations are untrue and we apologise to Sir Andrew. Link

Fun with photos

In yesterday’s early print editions we published an article about the arrest of Bradley Saunders ,’Olympic boxer held over £12,000 cocaine stash’ and, due to a captioning error by the picture agency, included a picture of the boxer, Tony Jeffries, by mistake. We apologise to Tony Jeffries for this error. Link

Apology

The Pandora column on 8 and 23 August referred to Ian McCartney and his advisory work for Fluor. We have been asked to make it clear that Mr McCartney personally receives none of the remuneration for this role: part of the fee is used to employ someone in the House of Commons from his Makerfield constituency and the rest is used to support the Women’s Interlink Foundation (www.womensinterlinkfoundation.org ), a charity based in India which provides disadvantaged women and children with drinking water, health treatments, housing and education. We apologise to Mr McCartney for not including this information in the letter we published from him and for the subsequent misleading Pandora item. Link

Rest is fine

There were several errors in the obituary of the saxophonist Pat Crumly [7 October].
Crumly died on 28 September, not 29 September. He was married three times, not twice, the third time to Hannah Jackson in 1994. Ronnie Scott did not add him to his own quartet – the Ronnie Scott’s Legacy Band was not Scott’s Quartet with Patrick replacing the leader but was a band set up to celebrate the legacy of Ronnie Scott. The Ronnie Scott Legacy band did not play in Athens; it was Crumly’s own quartet, the Pat Crumly Quartet.
When he appeared in Beirut and Kurdistan, it was with Ilham Al Madfai, the Iraqi musician and singer, and his band.
Link

Apology

In an item in Tuesday’s ‘Pandora’, ‘Strange but is it true? The mysterious boycott of Little Britain’, we quoted a New York radio presenter who said that he thought that the claimed West Hollywood Gay Lesbian Alliance protests about Little Britain’s series for the USA were most likely planted by someone’s publicist to generate publicity… ‘ We accept that MBC PR, publicists for Little Britain, did not do thiis. We also accept that ‘Little Britain’s new US show is not the ‘most politically incorrect , offensive and obnoxious material ever seen in this country’ and is suitable for broadcast. We apologise to all concerned. Link

A pseudo-apology to Victoria Beckham

It has come to our attention that in recent years, we, The Media, may have mistakenly given the impression that Victoria Beckham was a figure of ridicule. Certain articles and other items pertaining to the popular Spice Girls singer could have led readers to question her talent and integrity, it has been found. Indeed, some remarks relating to the well-known entertainer and mother of three were open to misinterpretation as criticism of her, and may have been received by some readers as such.
Now, a lengthy and in-depth inquiry has proven that Mrs Beckham is beyond reproach. Moreover, she is known to be respected as an International Style Icon and celebrated as the pinnacle of British culture. We therefore accept that everything we said before was wholly misleading and untrue, and issue an unreserved apology. We hope that Mrs Beckham can forgive us for this inaccurate reporting, which we now withdraw without exception.
The exhaustive investigation carried out by us, The Media, has found that the false and ambiguous reports concerning Mrs Beckham began as early as 1994, when she enlisted as a member of the band, henceforth known as the Pop Geniuses, the Spice Girls. During these early days of her meteoric and wholly deserved rise to fame, her enigmatic smile and aspects of her reserved personality led certain sections of The Media to mislabel her grace and natural reserve, referring to her, with clumsy affection, as “Posh”.
This was not, of course, intended to signal standoffishness or lack of charm; in fact, the intention was to convey respect and deference. However, last week it was found that elements among the less-educated reaches of the reading public may have misunderstood this complex frame of reference, believing the appellation to be a joke, a nickname or a form of sport. We would like to insist that this was not the case.
Over the years that followed other aspects of our, The Media’s, unfettered enthusiasm for Mrs Beckham, her career and her place in the national culture have been equally inelegantly expressed. For instance when, in 2000, some of the younger and less experienced members of ourselves, The Media, began to refer to her admiringly as Skeletal Spice, there were those among the public who assumed this to be a sign of disapproval or disrespect, we have been informed. Naturally we can rebut this inference wholeheartedly. Likewise, any reference, circa 2004, to a Ms Loos or persons of a similar nature was either the product of the writer’s imagination or used fictitiously. Any resemblance to any persons (living or dead), events or locales was entirely coincidental.
Nor, we are pleased to clarify, is this investigation, our apology or any of the events heretofore pertaining, timed to reflect or in any way coincide with the reading public’s staunch refusal to hate Mrs Beckham and their insistence on buying her stylish new clothing range. As we are happy to point out, we, The Media, have been keen supporters of Mrs Beckham since day one, and any indications to the contrary have been entirely in the imaginations of you, the reading public. Shame on you. In fact, many of us in The Media have had Pops, or Posh Crops, since even before last week. Though they have never suited us quite as well as Mrs Beckham’s does her.
We are happy to make this clear wholly, entirely and unreservedly, whatever you may think.
Sincerely,
The Media
Link

Apology

In our 8 June article headlined “Western giants feel the force of the Alfa males” we reported a reference in the Indian press that Mikhail Fridman was being investigated by anti-money laundering agencies in Europe. We can confirm that we have no evidence of any such investigation, and apologise to Mr Fridman. We also reported that Mr Fridman is the cousin of Dmitry Fridman, the director of a company, Farimex, which has brought proceedings against the Norwegian company, Telenor. We accept that neither Mr Fridman nor any Alfa Group company has any connection with either Dmitry Fridman or Farimex. Link

Advantage Mr. Dee

Our report on 23 April suggested that until the British tennis professional Robert Dee won a match in April this year, he had lost every previous professional match he had played, enduring a run of 54 consecutive defeats. We now accept that this was wrong as Mr Dee had won, and continues to win, many professional matches in Spain where he is based and plays most of his competitive tennis, including 20 matches in the last year alone. We apologise to Mr Dee. Link

All wrong

In our article about Bolton Wanderers (8 April 2008) under the headline “Bolton set to sack Megson”, we incorrectly stated that the club was planning an overhaul in its management structure and was set to appoint a coach to work with a director of football and that as a result Gary Megson would be sacked.
Bolton Wanderers Football Club has asked us to point out that the statements were totally incorrect and that Bolton Wanderers Football Club was not, and is not, considering a change in its management and has not considered changing the manager, far less made such a decision.
Link

Apology, with damages

Contrary to the impression given by the headline to the Pandora column on 13 June, the Temporary Denial Order imposed by the US Department of Commerce on a number of companies including Balli Group plc does not relate to arms but to passenger airplanes. We accept that the matter has nothing whatsoever to do with arms and we apologise to them and to Lord Lamont for this error. Balli Group plc’s position is that the decision to issue the Order was based on inaccurate information, it has instructed attorneys to appeal against the Order and is fully cooperating with the Department’s enquiries. We will pay substantial damages which Balli Group plc are donating to the British Museum. Link