Tag Archives: inaccurate accusations

UPDATED: Wrong about Rev. Wright

In this story, a voter suggests that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright has made anti-gay comments. NPR has not been able to find any evidence that Wright made such comments. Wright has supported the ordination of gay clergy. He also started a singles group for gay and lesbian members at his church. Our story should have acknowledged this. Link

UPDATE April 11, 2008: Alicia Shepard, the NPR ombudsman, wrote an column that details how this error made it to air. From her piece:

Jason Carlson was driving home listening to All Things Considered (ATC) on March 24 when he heard a gay man say he would not vote for Sen. Barack Obama because the senator’s pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was anti-gay.
That didn’t gibe with what Carlson, an Evanston, Ill. high school science teacher, knew about Wright. Later, Carlson did a quick Internet search using “Wright” and “anti-gay,” and discovered that what he had heard on NPR was, in fact, wrong. In a piece edited before broadcast,
ATC had put something on air without checking to make sure it was correct.
Carlson immediately emailed NPR pointing out how much Wright has done for gays and lesbians. “With the craziness that is already swirling around this campaign, diligence is required on everyone’s part to keep the misinformation to a minimum,” his email said.
Wright has some controversial stands but he is not anti-gay. Wright’s record of outreach to gays and lesbian is extensive and well-documented in the public record.
The three-minute segment that drew Carlson’s ire was filed by veteran public radio reporter Joel Rose, who was reporting on the Obama campaign’s effort to recruit independent voters to register as Democrats for the upcoming Pennsylvania primary. As Independent voter Chuck Aronson was switching to the Democratic party, he said Obama lost his vote because of Wright, whom he mistakenly described as anti-gay.
“That actually really upset me, being a gay man and hearing like anti-gay and anti- all kinds of things,” Aronson said in the ATC piece. “It’s really — you know, I just — it sort of disappointed me that he just, at some point, didn’t get up and go, you know what, I just really don’t want to be a part of it.”
In using this tape in his story, Rose made the kind of mistake even an experienced journalist can make, but shouldn’t: he assumed. He assumed that Aronson knew what he was talking about.
“Chuck (Aronson) was so sure of himself that I got distracted by his enthusiasm,” said Rose in an email. “I’m still glad he was in the story because he helps make the point that not all former independents are planning to vote for Obama. But clearly I should have been more selective about what was in the quote (and what wasn’t).”

LA Times apologizes for getting duped on Tupac story

How did the Los Angeles Times not realize it was being duped during its six-month investigation into the shooting of Tupac Shakur?

The paper has apologized for relying on forged documents in reporting a story about a 1994 attack on Shakur. The Times story took months of reporting and preparation; The Smoking Gun took roughly a week to reveal its fatal flaws.

Clearly, something went terribly wrong at the paper, and those involved have apologized:

Reporter Chuck Philips and his supervisor, Deputy Managing Editor Marc Duvoisin, issued statements of apology Wednesday afternoon. The statements came after The Times took withering criticism for the Shakur article, which appeared on latimes.com last week and two days later in the paper’s Calendar section…
“In relying on documents that I now believe were fake, I failed to do my job,” Philips said in a statement Wednesday. “I’m sorry.”
In his statement, Duvoisin added: “We should not have let ourselves be fooled. That we were is as much my fault as Chuck’s. I deeply regret that we let our readers down.”
Times Editor Russ Stanton announced that the newspaper would launch an internal review of the documents and the reporting surrounding the story. Stanton said he took the criticisms of the March 17 report “very seriously.”
“We published this story with the sincere belief that the documents were genuine, but our good intentions are beside the point,” Stanton said in a statement.
“The bottom line is that the documents we relied on should not have been used. We apologize both to our readers and to those referenced in the documents and, as a result, in the story. We are continuing to investigate this matter and will fulfill our journalistic responsibility for critical self-examination.”

Some critics are surprised by the paper’s inability to instantly determine what went wrong. But it would be more surprising if the Times could suddenly point to one fatal flaw. That would mean the paper didn’t have the necessary faith in the documents required to publish a potentially defamatory story. It would mean they published with doubts in their minds. Clearly, the Times believed it had the goods. Perhaps more importantly, it wanted to have the goods. Like Dan Rather wanted to have the goods on President George Bush’s National Guard record.

In the end, the Times staffers involved were satisfied that the purported FBI documents were legitimate. This was likely the result of a process during which they tried to check themselves (”What if we’re wrong?”). But they also had a desire to not have wasted their time (”What if we’re right?!”). They wanted the documents, the scoop, to be real. This form of confirmation bias is the bane of every journalist, and a boon to unreliable sources and hoaxsters. They know we want it; it’s just a matter of setting the right trap.

Everything that comes after the moment of mental confirmation will only serve to further confirm the accepted truth. It’s easy to make things fit a point of view once you’ve convinced yourself that it’s accurate.

I’m sure Philips and Duvoisin are shocked at how wrong the story was. Assuming the paper does a proper examination, they’ll probably see a pattern emerge: an assemblage of assumptions, confirmation bias, and misinterpretations mixed with, I’m guessing, a little bit of bad luck and unintentional sloppiness thrown in for good measure.

In hindsight, some mistakes will seem obvious. Maybe people will deem them to be stupid mistakes. Hopefully, these mistakes, stupid and otherwise, will serve to inform new policies and procedures. Moving on without addressing them only guarantees repetition.

This incident is an interesting contrast. At some point along the way, the Times decided: this looks legit. Then The Smoking Gun looked at the same set of facts and documents and said: this looks bogus.

It was a binary problem and TSG solved it.

Daily Express, Daily Star issue front page apologies, pay damages

Today was a historic day for newspaper apologies. A sad, shameful, embarrassingly historic day.

Two UK papers controlled by the same owner (Express Newspapers) issued front page apologies to a British couple, Kate and Gerry McCann. The apologies will be repeated in the related Sunday editions of both papers, the Sunday Express and Daily Star Sunday*.

In more than 100 articles, the papers had repeatedly and forcefully suggested that the couple were responsible for the disappearance of their young daughter. Roy Greenslade of the Guardian summed up the papers’ work:

This was no journalistic accident, but a sustained campaign of vitriol against a grief-stricken family. The stories were not merely speculative, but laced with innuendo which continually made accusations against the McCanns on the basis of anonymous sources and without any hard evidence.

Wild claims, often made by unattributed sources to Portuguese newspapers, were then spun even more negatively by the Express and Star titles. Of course, they were not the only papers to carry prejudicial material, but they were by far the worst.

Realizing that it could not win in court, and could not defend their work, Express Newspapers negotiated a settlement with the couple that includes the apologies and a payment of roughly $1 million. This is the apology published by the Daily Express (”The World’s Greatest Newspaper”):

The Daily Express has taken the unprecedented step of making a front-page apology to Kate and Gerry McCann.
We did so because we accept that a number of articles in the newspaper have suggested that the couple caused the death of their missing daughter Madeleine and then covered it up.
We acknowledge that there is no evidence whatsoever to support this theory and that Kate and Gerry are completely innocent of any involvement in their daughter’s disappearance.
We trust that the suspicion that has clouded their lives for many months will soon be lifted.
As an expression of its regret, the Daily Express has now paid a very substantial sum into the Madeleine Fund and we promise to do all in our power to help efforts to find her.
Kate and Gerry, we are truly sorry to have added to your distress.
We assure you that we hope Madeleine will one day be found alive and well and will be restored to her loving family.

It was a questionable decision to begin the apology with a statement that seems to suggest that the paper is doing something noble, and purely of its own choosing. A front page apology was a necessity, and a long overdue one at that. So many of the offending stories had been on the front page that to offer anything less in terms of placement would have been unacceptable.

The Express, and the Daily Star (apology here), took this step because they finally came to see they had been wholly irresponsible and wanted to avoid a massively expensive lawsuit. I don’t mean to suggest there isn’t any genuine remorse at the papers, but it’s not the sole motivation for the apologies. It’s likely not even the dominant one.

Since this website launched in fall of 2004, the most notable apologies have consistently appeared in the UK press. But two papers with front page apologies on the same day, and two repeats to come? Yes, you could call that unprecedented. But the actions that led to this event bring other words to mind.

*Correction April 9: The name of the Daily Star Sunday was initially and incorrectly written as the “Daily Sunday Star.” It has been corrected. Thanks Smylers!

Bad for business

In the March edition of “The Australian Financial Review Magazine” there was incorrect information about Fortescue Metals. The article “The wild, mild west”, on pages 24-32 of the magazine, stated that the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) had been involved in civil and criminal charges against Fortescue Metals. In fact, no criminal charges have been brought against Fortescue.

Wrong name, no evidence

An article in Feb. 18 editions repeated charges made by Republican candidate for Congress Dean Hrbacek that a law firm, Williams & Jensen, had ties to Jack Abramoff. The article also cited reports that the firm’s managing partner, L. Steven Hart, traveled with a group of government officials and lobbyists to Scotland to play golf. After being contacted by Williams & Jensen concerning the accuracy of the article, the Houston Chronicle’s re-examination has revealed that Hart’s correct name is J. Steven Hart, that there is no credible evidence that Hart traveled to Scotland with government officials on one of Abramoff’s trips or otherwise, and, also, that there is no credible evidence that Williams and Jensen has any “ties” to Abramoff or his lobbying activities. Link

Red scare

Eugene Kaspersky, co-founder and CEO of the internet security company Kaspersky Lab, was never a “KGB man” or a lieutenant in the KGB (The ex-KGB man stalking the cybercriminals, page 5, Technology, January 31). He studied cryptography at a high school which was then co-sponsored by the Russian department of defence and KGB, and went on to work for the department of defence. Link

Be sure to check those letters to the editor

A Dec. 4 letter to the editor described Gary McHale in a way that was not accurate. The Hamilton Spectator withdraws any suggestion that Mr. McHale has perpetrated violence in his activities at Caledonia. The Hamilton Spectator apologizes for the error. Link

Stripper poles deemed sound

There is no documented evidence to suggest dance poles sold at Condom Shack cannot bear the weight of a user. An unsubstantiated claim appeared in a Post Homes feature on Saturday. Link

Not a drunk driver

Julie A. Tucker of Holland was not charged with driving while intoxicated as part of a sobriety checkpoint that state police operated Jan. 1 in the Town of Aurora, as was reported in The News on Jan. 2. State police erroneously listed her among the drivers charged.

Yeah, it may have

A Pioneer Press front-page headline on Nov. 2 read, “Finney pal indicted in 1981 killing.” This headline may have carried the implication that Bill Finney, the retired St. Paul police chief, was involved in the grand jury murder indictment of Aaron Foster, in connection with the 1981 death of Barbara Winn. Finney is not mentioned in that indictment. We regret any unintended implication.

Apology

In an article on page A10 of the Jan. 30 edition of the Citizen, a number of inaccurate statements were made about Ottawa surgeon Dr. Joel Freeman.
Dr. Freeman was never convicted of any offence over an alleged road rage incident in September 2004 and received an absolute discharge after pleading guilty to the charge of assault in April 2006. At that time, Dr. Freeman was acquitted of a charge of assault with a weapon, and a charge of possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose was withdrawn by the Crown, after no evidence was led that he held a closed pocket knife during the incident. Further, Dr. Freeman was not forced to resign his privileges at The Ottawa Hospital but did so voluntarily in June 2005.
The Citizen apologizes to Dr. Freeman for any harm caused by these errors.
Link

Thanks, Ruth!

Bad for business

In an article ‘Get rich quick’ property training course throws caution to the wind (Money, page 8, March 31, 2007) we did not intend to suggest that Win Investing recommends tax evasion. We also accept Darren Winters’ assurance that he did not sell pyramid investments as a student at Exeter University. Link

Frogmouth and his lovely voice

Also last week, in “An opening night bash to Thai for”, we complimented Jonathan Roxmouth on his beautiful voice. Unfortunately, we called him Jonathan Frogmouth. We apologise for the error.

And:

We apologise to Kate Moss for any distress caused by our article last week regarding alleged events at her birthday party at the Dorchester Hotel in London. The story, which was first published in News of the World, was untrue. The News of the World has apologised and paid substantial damages to Moss. In its apology, News of the World said it had been offered information from a usually reliable source, which it now accepted was untrue. Link to both

Thanks, Anne!

Correction March 5: The image accompanying this post was originally that of the The Times, rather than the Sunday Times. Thanks, Joe!

Respect for the dead

Musician’s life: A Critic’s Notebook in Sunday’s Arts & Music section said that the late pianist and composer Ervin Nyiregyhazi probably had an affair with the wife of conductor Artur Rodzinski. He did not. Also, a photo caption accompanying the article identified Nyiregyhazi as Romanian. He was Hungarian. Link

Sorry for calling you a rapist

IN THE weekend edition of January 12-13, The Courier-Mail published an article, “Aurukun rape victim in hiding”, which incorrectly said that a 12-year-old child had been raped by her father before she was five. The Courier-Mail regrets the error, retracts the allegation and apologises to the father for any distress and embarrassment caused as a result of the publication.

Apology

In a story published on Page 7 of the Thursday edition of the Ottawa Sun, it was incorrectly reported that an expert testified that OPP officers, involved in a fatal Nov. 2005 shooting, did not follow their training.
It was incorrectly stated that an OPP officer broke OPP rules regarding the shooting. It was also incorrectly reported that an OPP officer might have had a better view of the victim had he been in a different position.
The Sun apologizes for the errors.

Sorry for saying you fondled your daughter

OUR article last Tuesday headed “It’s Sven Giggle Eriksson” pictured Mr Eriksson in a hotel restaurant with a young lady.
We wrongly assumed that the lady was an admirer and suggested that he was fondling her.
In fact the lady was Lina, Mr Eriksson’s daughter, with whom he was having a normal fatherly embrace.
We apologise to Mr Eriksson and his daughter for the embarrassment and distress caused by the publication of the photographs and incorrect assumptions made about them.

Playing the Giants? This is what you get

A sports article on Thursday about the surprising emergence of running back Ryan Grant of the Green Bay Packers referred incorrectly to his classroom performance at the University of Notre Dame. The university said he was never ineligible to play for academic or other reasons; he did not miss one season because of academic trouble. Link

Additional pain and suffering

IN THURSDAY’S Birmingham Mail, we reported that the late John Powell, aged 17, of Amington Road, Shirley, had used cocaine before driving in a crash that killed him and his passenger in Baldwins Lane, Hall Green, on February 2 last year.
This was incorrect.
Although Mr Powell was slightly over the drink-drive limit, he had not taken any drugs.
We would like to apologise to his family for our error and for any distress caused.

Much better

The Daily Telegraph yesterday said in a story that Virgin Atlantic was involved in a price fixing conspiracy with Qantas and two other airlines.
This is incorrect.
Virgin Atlantic was involved in another case where it colluded on fuel surcharges with British Airways.

Apology

On 9 January 2008, “The Australian Financial Review” (AFR) commented on business dealings by the former prime minister Paul Keating. The page 11 article referred to his closeness to former Indonesian president Soeharto and described these as “difficult memories” for the Australian Labor Party. The AFR accepts that Keating has not had business dealings with Soeharto, nor any person associated with his regime, and that their association was in accordance with the official relationship expected of heads of state. The AFR apologises to Paul Keating for any embarrassment from the article.

How to make someone hate your newspaper

A police blotter listing in some editions of Neighbors on Thursday mistakenly listed charges against Mark F. Campbell, 54, of Central Square. The listing incorrectly said the Oswego County Sheriff’s Office charged Campbell with aggravated driving while intoxicated, driving while intoxicated, third-degree aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle and failure to keep right. Campbell faces no such charges. Campbell appears in a sheriff’s report that says on Dec. 26 his car was struck by a horse on county Route 4 in Palermo. The collision resulted in no tickets.

Doped by the press

A front-page pointer in yesterday’s Canberra Times said ACT cyclist Michael Rogers was named in new doping allegations. Anti-doping expert Professor Werner Franke told German radio earlier this week the entire T-Mobile team, which included Rogers, had resorted to blood transfusions.
Professor Franke did not name Rogers individually. Rogers has denied ever being involved with performance-enhancing drugs or blood doping.

Tried in the press

Dallas A. Crockett went to federal prison in 1997 after being convicted of fraud and in 1998 after being convicted of a parole violation related to his fraud conviction. A Dec. 11, 2007, article was imprecise about the reason for his second stint in prison and may have incorrectly implied he was twice convicted of fraud. Additionally, a Dec. 13, 2007, article about Crockett settling with two of three defendants in his defamation lawsuit against them was incorrectly labeled as a public safety item. There is no support for the implication relating to Crockett’s second stint in prison or for the implication that his lawsuit related to criminal activity, and The Oregonian regrets the publication of the original statements. Link

Apology

On November 11, we published a news story headlined ‘Cruise furious at reporter Morton’.
It was reported that Andrew Morton had run into serious trouble when writing a biography of Tom Cruise because of threats from Scientologists.
The story was originally published in, and accredited in our story to, the Sunday Express, who have since accepted that the story is not true and that Mr Morton has not received threats nor was he forced to sell his flat and move underground to write the book.
The Sunday Express has published an apology and we are pleased to do likewise and apologise to the Church of Scientology and its members for the embarrassment and distress caused by the article.