Tag Archives: apologies

Apology

On the first page of the Business section of Sunday’s Post-Gazette we printed an article about Stanley Druckenmiller and his company Duquesne Capital Management. The article included headlines that suggested that the funds which Mr. Druckenmiller and Duquesne Capital manage had suffered significant losses and that Mr. Druckenmiller had been “sacked” and “took it on the chin” in the financial markets. Unfortunately, the author of the article did not check the accuracy of the facts with Mr. Druckenmiller or Duquesne Capital. According to Mr. Druckenmiller and other published reports, all of the funds managed by him and that organization have had positive returns for the year. In addition, the headlines that accompanied the story were, in hindsight, misleading and did not reflect the more qualified points made in the story itself. Simply put, we did not adhere to our own standards. We sincerely apologize to Mr. Druckenmiller and Duquesne Capital for these lapses. Link

Apology

The Sunday Telegraph wishes to apologise to Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull in relation to a story titled “Turnbull rant about PM and his ‘rude’ wife” published on November 9 2008.
The paper accepts the story was wrong and Mr Turnbull did not accuse Therese Rein of being rude or discourteous. He also did not say he had been snubbed by the PM’s wife.

Apology

AN article published in The Weekend Australian on July 22, 2006, (MP with stars in his eyes for killers, page 1) referred to former MP Peter Breen’s support for, and feelings towards, two men jailed for their part in the rape and murder of Janine Balding. Any inference that this support was based on a romantic love for the two men was not intended and is incorrect. The Australian apologises to Mr Breen for any distress caused.

An end to an affair that never was

In our November 3 issue, we suggested that the actress Kelly Reilly was having a relationship with Guy Ritchie.
It is now clear from the further information that we have received that Ms. Reilly is engaged and there is and has been no romantic relationship between Kelly Reilly and Guy Ritchie. We apologize for any embarrassment caused to Ms. Reilly in our original report. Link

Apology

THE Courier-Mail in December last year ran reports on the collapse of two companies, Superior Wealth Creation and Super Equity.
Each referred to a Brisbane businessman, Mr John Buckby, pictured.
Some readers may have believed the reports suggested Mr Buckby had been knowingly involved in encouraging investors to put their money into flawed investments.
Mr Buckby told The Courier-Mail in December he was a victim of the collapse of Super Equity and we reported his comment. The newspaper is now happy to put on the record that it accepts this is the case.
The Courier-Mail also accepts the case that Mr Buckby did not profit from nor was he behind either venture, nor was he connected with either company. We apologise to Mr Buckby and his family for any hurt caused if some readers believed otherwise.

BBC airs apology for Russell Brand/Jonathan Ross affair

BBC issued an on air apology on Radio 2 Saturday morning in order to try and make amends for the Russel Brand/Jonathan Ross scandal. Below is the text of the apology. (A slightly different version that didn’t mention Mr. Sachs’ wife and family was broadcast prior to this altered version.)

On 18 October, the BBC broadcast an exchange between Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross on the Russell Brand show on Radio 2.
This concerned the actor Andrew Sachs and his granddaughter, Georgina Baillie.
Some of this exchange was left on the voicemail of Mr Sachs.
The conversation was grossly offensive and an unacceptable intrusion into the private lives of both Mr Sachs and Ms Baillie.
It was a serious breach of editorial standards, and should never have been recorded or broadcast.
The BBC would like to apologise unreservedly to Mr and Mrs Sachs, Ms Baillie and their family, and to our audiences as licence fee payers.

Apology

An article that appeared in the Cape Argus on October 30, under the headline “Workers turn to CCMA after eviction from farm” contained inaccuracies, generalisations and misrepresentations about the owner of the farm, Anton Horstmann. It represented as fact a number of allegations against him.
The report was inadequately researched and did not give Horstmann adequate space to respond to the claims made by families living and working on the farm in Philippi, which he has sold. The Cape Argus appreciates that the land and labour dispute is a complex one and it required considerable research before publication. The paper apologises for the unbalanced nature of the report.

Times-Picayune apologizes for getting McCain’s abortion stance wrong in election day edition

To our Readers:
In Tuesday’s editions of The Times-Picayune, a graphic on page A-5 detailing the presidential candidates’ stands on various issues erroneously stated that Sen. John McCain favors abortion rights.
When we became aware of the error, we corrected it on our affiliated web site, NOLA.com.
It was a serious mistake, all the more so because it appeared on Election Day. We take full responsibility for it. I have spoken to and emailed dozens of readers who called and wrote, deeply and understandably upset with us. Some believed that the misstatement in the graphic was intentional. I assure you it was not. Others speculated that it might be connected in some way to the endorsement of Barack Obama by our editorial page. The staffers who produce our editorial page are separate from those who report and edit the news pages.
What happened in this case? The Associated Press sent us the graphic, with the correct positions attributed to Sen. McCain and Sen. Barack Obama. In the course of re-shaping the graphic to fit our page, we inadvertently transposed the candidates’ positions. For the record, Sen. McCain believes that the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade should be reversed and that the decision about abortion should be returned to the individual states.
The error should have been caught before it went to press. It wasn’t.
Again, we take responsibility for the error. It was not intentional, but it was deeply regrettable. To all of our readers: We value your loyalty to our newspaper and hope to earn it every day. Please accept our apology.
Sincerely,
Jim Amoss, editor
Link

Nearly 200 years later, an apology to Thomas Jefferson

On last night’s Daily Show, historian Doris Kearns Goodwin told an interesting story about a belated newspaper apology. She said a Connecticut newspaper had been incredibly harsh to Thomas Jefferson during a campaign, and that nearly 200 years later it apologized for its nastiness.

I’ve made a habit of noting belated newspaper apologies, so I went looking for this one. Low and behold, the Hartford Courant published this “Dear Tom Jefferson” editorial on April 13, 1993 :

On your 250th birthday today, it seems proper to let bygones be bygones.
During the post-Colonial years, you and The Courant didn’t see eye to eye about America’s future. On these pages, this newspaper called you an anti-Christian, a dupe and a cat’s paw of the French.
Remember The Courant’s campaign against you in the presidential election of 1800? In a series of letters signed by “Burleigh,” the publishers Barzillai Hudson and George Goodwin gave their reasons why your presidency would spell disaster. They feared that you would sacrifice the Constitution to the radical Jacobins, who were feared in their time as the Communists have been feared in our times.
One particularly gloomy outburst from Mr. Burleigh predicted the following outcome under your presidency: “Neighbors will become the enemies of neighbors, fathers of their sons, and sons of their fathers. Murder, robbery, rape, adultery and incest will openly be taught and practised, the air will be rent with the cries of distress, the soil soaked with blood, and the nation black with crimes.”
You didn’t like Alexander Hamilton’s ideas of a central government; The Courant did. You advocated separation of church and state, which The Courant thought to be a blasphemous idea. This newspaper denounced your purchase of the Louisiana Territory. When you raised concerns about limiting voting rights to property-owning white males, Messrs. Hudson and Goodwin became all the more convinced you were a Jacobin.
Well, it’s never too late to admit a mistake. We, the 1990s stewards of the nation’s oldest continuously published newspaper, have the benefit of hindsight. You turned out to be a good influence on America. In fact, some would say that you were a terrific influence on the world.
The Courant’s early publishers weren’t entirely off the mark, however. They were right to point out the contradiction, and hypocrisy, of your owning slaves and preaching freedom.
So you weren’t perfect, Tom. But The Courant wishes you happy birthday anyway. And if you were around in 1992, our hunch is that we would have championed your candidacy for president.

Wow, “Murder, robbery, rape, adultery and incest will openly be taught and practised.” Makes the coverage of the current campaign look downright genial.

Don’t hassle The Hoff

On 19 June 2007, we reported that David Hasselhoff had celebrated winning custody of his two daughters by getting drunk and making a nuisance of himself in a Hollywood bar.
We now accept that David did not drink any alcohol that evening and nor did he irritate other customers.
We apologise to David for any embarrassment caused.
Link

Thanks, Iris and Andrea!

Apology

In a report published in The Sunday Age on 16 September 2007 entitled ‘Is it the end of the line for a legendary seabird? This is where ‘Operation Albatross’ comes in’, it was said that Mr Brothers invented a chute device which drowned endangered albatrosses and other deep diving sea birds. The Sunday Age acknowledges that Mr Brothers did not invent the chute device and that it does not drown these sea birds. The Sunday Age apologies to Mr Brothers for any hurt he has suffered. Link

Thanks, Ben!

Apology

A Canberra Times report published on October 22 in part referred to evidence that the Australian Electoral Commission’s chief legal officer, Paul Pirani, gave to a Senate estimates committee on the previous day. Contrary to what was incorrectly reported in the article, Mr Pirani clearly indicated to the committee that the Commonwealth Electoral Act did not apply to the issue of ACT Labor advertisements placed in The Canberra Times before the recent ACT Legislative Assembly election and that the matter did not fall in the jurisdiction of the Australian Electoral Commission.
The Canberra Times apologises to Mr Pirani for any negative inference concerning his personal and professional conduct as the commission’s chief legal officer or that he acted either unlawfully or unprofessionally in the evidence he gave to the committee.

Apology

The Pandora column on 8 and 23 August referred to Ian McCartney and his advisory work for Fluor. We have been asked to make it clear that Mr McCartney personally receives none of the remuneration for this role: part of the fee is used to employ someone in the House of Commons from his Makerfield constituency and the rest is used to support the Women’s Interlink Foundation (www.womensinterlinkfoundation.org ), a charity based in India which provides disadvantaged women and children with drinking water, health treatments, housing and education. We apologise to Mr McCartney for not including this information in the letter we published from him and for the subsequent misleading Pandora item. Link

Apology

On 5 September we reported on Spanish litigation brought against Darragh MacAnthony. We stated that the claim was for £ 150million and that it arose out of Mr MacAnthony’s withdrawal of a valuable gift of shares.
Our report was based on agency copy. We now understand that the claim is in fact for approximately £ 8million and that it does not arise from the gift of shares. Our report contained other errors concerning Mr MacAnthony and we have written to him apologising for any distress and embarrassment caused.
Link

Express papers offer up more apologies to the McCanns

I previously wrote about the U.K.’s Express Newspapers making prominent apologies to Kate and Gerry McCann. Now the papers have stepped up with another round of apologies, including this one from the Express:

IN articles published between July and December last year we suggested that the holiday companions of Kate and Gerry McCann might have covered up the true facts concerning Madeleine McCann’s disappearance and/or misled the authorities investigating her disappearance.

We also reported speculation that one member of the group, Dr Russell O’Brien, was suspected of involvement with Madeleine’s abduction. We now accept that these suggestions should never have been made and were completely untrue. We apologise to Jane Tanner, Russell O’Brien, Fiona Payne, David Payne, Matthew Oldfield, Rachael Oldfield and Diane Webster to whom we have agreed to pay substantial damages which they will be donating to the Find Madeleine Fund.

The Guardian has some background:

The Daily Express and Daily Star have today printed apologies to the so-called “tapas seven” friends of Kate and Gerry McCann as part of a legal settlement.
Daily Express - ‘tapas seven’ apology Daily Express: ran apology on page 5
Today’s apologies, on page 5 of the Daily Express and page 3 of the Daily Star, come ahead of a statement about the “tapas seven” settlement to be read out in the high court in London at 10.30am.
Richard Desmond’s Express Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Express and Daily Star, will also pay the group £375,000 in damages, according to a report yesterday by the Sky News crime correspondent, Martin Brunt. The money will be donated to the Find Madeleine Fund.
Under the headline “Tapas seven - an apology”, both papers apologised for publishing “completely untrue” suggestions that the friends may have lied about the case …
More details of the holiday companions’ settlement with Express Newspapers are expected to be outlined in the high court statement before Mr Justice Eady.
The legal action, undertaken for the “tapas seven” by law firm Carter-Ruck, follows big payouts by British papers to the McCanns and to Robert Murat.
In July, Murat accepted more than £600,000 in damages from 11 British newspapers after he was libelled in more than 100 articles.
The Express Newspapers-owned Daily Express, Sunday Express and Daily Star; Associated Newspapers’ Daily Mail, Evening Standard, and Metro; Mirror Group Newspapers’ Daily Mirror and Sunday Mirror and Scottish Daily Record; and News Group’s Sun and News of the World acknowledged that the stories they had run about Murat over nine months were entirely untrue and should never have been printed.
In March, Kate and Gerry McCann accepted £550,000 from Express Newspapers after the Daily and Sunday Express, the Daily Star and Daily Star Sunday ran numerous defamatory articles after their daughter Madeleine disappeared from the Praia da Luz resort in Portugal on May 3, 2007.

Le Monde is très sorry for confusing your wives, President Sarkozy

Respected French newspaper Le Monde yesterday took the extraordinary step of publishing a front page apology to President Nicolas Sarkozy, his current wife, and his ex-wife. Reports Agence France-Presse:

Le Monde newspaper published a front-page apology today to ask for President Nicolas Sarkozy’s forgiveness after mixing up the names of his third wife, Carla Bruni, with his second, Cecilia.
“An unfortunate slip” caused it to write about Cecilia Bruni-Sarkozy in an article in Monday’s edition, the prestigious newspaper said. “We were of course referring to the wife of the head of state, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy.
“To our readers, to Mr and Mrs Sarkozy, to Mrs Cecilia Attia, we present our most sincere apologies,” it wrote.
Sarkozy married pop star Bruni in February after last year divorcing his second wife, Cecilia, who recently married events organiser Richard Attias and lives with him in Dubai.

U.K. paper to requires columnist to issue apology for remarks made on personal blog

Writing on his personal blog, a British priest mused that gay people should have “Sodomy can seriously damage your health” tattooed on their backsides, among other suggestions. This caused an uproar, and the priest, Peter Mullen, later issued an apology. He also happens to be a columnist for the Northern Echo newspaper, and its editor posted this notice on his blog:

A LOT of this morning’s nationals have carried the story about our columnist Peter Mullen getting himself into hot water with some ill-advised comments about homosexuals on his blog.
It was also mentioned by Sarah kennedy on BBC Radio 2 this morning.
I got a call when I came in from Peter, asking my advice on whether he should issue an apology via the Press Association.
I told him I thought it was the right thing to do.
I’ve always subscribed to the view that when things go wrong, the best thing to do is hold your hands up and say sorry.
Even though the comments were made on Peter’s own personal blog and have nothing to do with The Northern Echo, he will also be issuing an apology in his Echo column next week.

Apology

AN article which appeared in The Sunday Times on September 28 made several references by Rajendra Chaudhry to Ian Roche and Jane Tan.
Most of the references concerned Ms Tan and her employment.
We have since learned the allegations by Mr Chaudhry were baseless.
We apologise to Mr Roche and Ms Tan.

Apology

AN article titled “Dubbo donation scandal” published on May 1, 2008 concerned allegations that Duncan Gay MP used question time to lobby on behalf of Dubbo trucking company, Fletchers. Any inference that the questions asked in Parliament were as a result of donations he or the NSW Nationals received is incorrect. The Daily Telegraph apologises to The Hon Duncan Gay MLC.

Apology

Butterball turkeys are in no way connected to Maple Leaf Foods or the recent listeriosis outbreak in Canada.

This photo (above) depicting Butterball turkeys should not have been published with a Sept. 15 opinion article about the safety of cheap food. The Star did not intend to suggest that Butterball turkeys are unsafe. The Star apologizes for this error. Link

Apology

In an item in Tuesday’s ‘Pandora’, ‘Strange but is it true? The mysterious boycott of Little Britain’, we quoted a New York radio presenter who said that he thought that the claimed West Hollywood Gay Lesbian Alliance protests about Little Britain’s series for the USA were most likely planted by someone’s publicist to generate publicity… ‘ We accept that MBC PR, publicists for Little Britain, did not do thiis. We also accept that ‘Little Britain’s new US show is not the ‘most politically incorrect , offensive and obnoxious material ever seen in this country’ and is suitable for broadcast. We apologise to all concerned. Link

Apology

Tesco has accepted a formal offer of apology by the Guardian in relation to the reports “Tesco’s £1bn tax avoiding plan - move to the Cayman Islands” and “Every little bit helps: tax free pot of gold at end of Tesco’s rainbow” (pages 1 and 27, February 27) and a related editorial and podcast. In these articles we reported that Tesco had created an elaborate off-shore corporate structure to avoid paying up to £1bn in UK corporation tax on profits from the sale of its UK properties, and that it had already successfully avoided corporation tax on the £500m profit it made from its first two property sales. We also suggested that this corporation tax avoidance was hypocritical, having regard to Tesco’s public stance on social responsibility, and that Tesco’s response to the charge had been evasive.

We now accept that these damaging allegations were unfounded and should not have been published. All profits generated by this sale and leaseback arrangement were earned by UK tax-resident companies and have been or will be included in Tesco’s UK tax returns. The use of Cayman Island companies in the scheme was for legitimate stamp duty savings purposes. We also accept that Tesco’s responses to the charges were truthful.

We regret that we did not publish the letter from Tesco’s tax adviser received on the day of publication of the original articles and accept that the correction published on May 3 was insufficient. We accept that Tesco was not hypocritical in its corporation tax planning of these transactions having regard to its public stance on social responsibility and has a legitimate interest in seeing the facts about its tax arrangements fairly and accurately reported. Furthermore, we accept that Tesco is a very significant taxpayer, having contributed over £1bn to the public purse for the year to February 2007. We are happy to put the record straight and apologise to Tesco. We have also agreed to pay a sum by way of damages to a charity of Tesco’s choice and a payment by way of costs.

A pseudo-apology to Victoria Beckham

It has come to our attention that in recent years, we, The Media, may have mistakenly given the impression that Victoria Beckham was a figure of ridicule. Certain articles and other items pertaining to the popular Spice Girls singer could have led readers to question her talent and integrity, it has been found. Indeed, some remarks relating to the well-known entertainer and mother of three were open to misinterpretation as criticism of her, and may have been received by some readers as such.
Now, a lengthy and in-depth inquiry has proven that Mrs Beckham is beyond reproach. Moreover, she is known to be respected as an International Style Icon and celebrated as the pinnacle of British culture. We therefore accept that everything we said before was wholly misleading and untrue, and issue an unreserved apology. We hope that Mrs Beckham can forgive us for this inaccurate reporting, which we now withdraw without exception.
The exhaustive investigation carried out by us, The Media, has found that the false and ambiguous reports concerning Mrs Beckham began as early as 1994, when she enlisted as a member of the band, henceforth known as the Pop Geniuses, the Spice Girls. During these early days of her meteoric and wholly deserved rise to fame, her enigmatic smile and aspects of her reserved personality led certain sections of The Media to mislabel her grace and natural reserve, referring to her, with clumsy affection, as “Posh”.
This was not, of course, intended to signal standoffishness or lack of charm; in fact, the intention was to convey respect and deference. However, last week it was found that elements among the less-educated reaches of the reading public may have misunderstood this complex frame of reference, believing the appellation to be a joke, a nickname or a form of sport. We would like to insist that this was not the case.
Over the years that followed other aspects of our, The Media’s, unfettered enthusiasm for Mrs Beckham, her career and her place in the national culture have been equally inelegantly expressed. For instance when, in 2000, some of the younger and less experienced members of ourselves, The Media, began to refer to her admiringly as Skeletal Spice, there were those among the public who assumed this to be a sign of disapproval or disrespect, we have been informed. Naturally we can rebut this inference wholeheartedly. Likewise, any reference, circa 2004, to a Ms Loos or persons of a similar nature was either the product of the writer’s imagination or used fictitiously. Any resemblance to any persons (living or dead), events or locales was entirely coincidental.
Nor, we are pleased to clarify, is this investigation, our apology or any of the events heretofore pertaining, timed to reflect or in any way coincide with the reading public’s staunch refusal to hate Mrs Beckham and their insistence on buying her stylish new clothing range. As we are happy to point out, we, The Media, have been keen supporters of Mrs Beckham since day one, and any indications to the contrary have been entirely in the imaginations of you, the reading public. Shame on you. In fact, many of us in The Media have had Pops, or Posh Crops, since even before last week. Though they have never suited us quite as well as Mrs Beckham’s does her.
We are happy to make this clear wholly, entirely and unreservedly, whatever you may think.
Sincerely,
The Media
Link

A cutting correction

From the June 13 issue of Private Eye magazine:

Our item about Slough in the last issue said the leader of the Tory group on the council was Cllr Diana Coad. In fact that honour currently falls to one Derek Cryer. “Lady” Diana, who is also the party’s parliamentary candidate for the town, merely behaves as if she is leader.
Apologies to the invisible man.

Thanks, Steve!

A pseudo-apology from The Sun

The Sun may have inadvertantly suggested that former England manager Sven Goran Eriksson was a prize twerp in selecting Theo Walcott for the 2006 World Cup squad.
We now accept Mr Eriksson was ahead of his time and correctly recognised his ability. We wholeheartedly apologise.
Link

More here.