<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restaurant review in bad taste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/restaurant-review-in-bad-taste/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/restaurant-review-in-bad-taste</link>
	<description>Mistakes Happen</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fagstein</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/restaurant-review-in-bad-taste#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>Fagstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/restaurant-review-in-bad-taste#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>Did the "free-lancer" really agree not to write for the paper anymore? Or was the writer just sacked by the paper? Why did the paper agree not to run any more articles? Were the number of mistakes too much, or did the paper feel there was a serious enough breach of journalistic ethics to warrant a blacklisting?

This is also a good reason why having freelancers write reviews (especially on such touchy subjects as restaurants) isn't such a great idea.

Other than that, it's a good correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the &#8220;free-lancer&#8221; really agree not to write for the paper anymore? Or was the writer just sacked by the paper? Why did the paper agree not to run any more articles? Were the number of mistakes too much, or did the paper feel there was a serious enough breach of journalistic ethics to warrant a blacklisting?</p>
<p>This is also a good reason why having freelancers write reviews (especially on such touchy subjects as restaurants) isn&#8217;t such a great idea.</p>
<p>Other than that, it&#8217;s a good correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
