Editor’s note

A front-page article on Tuesday described the problems of the tribunals at the American military base in Guantánamo, as seen through the failure to resolve the case of Abdul Razzaq Hekmati, an Afghan war hero who died there Dec. 30 after a five-year-long detention. The article quoted several Afghan officials who said they were prepared to offer evidence that he was falsely accused, but were never given a chance to do so.
Andy Worthington, a freelance journalist who worked on the article under contract with The New York Times and was listed as its co-author, did some of the initial reporting but was not involved in all of it, and The Times verified the information he provided. That included the fact of Mr. Hekmati’s death, and the content of transcripts released by the Pentagon showing that the accusations against Mr. Hekmati had been made by unidentified sources and that the tribunal at Guantánamo had never called outside witnesses requested by detainees.
Mr. Worthington has written a book, “The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison,” in which he takes the position that Guantánamo is part of what he describes as a cruel and misguided response by the Bush administration to the Sept. 11 attacks. He has also expressed strong criticism of Guantánamo in articles published elsewhere.
The editors were not aware of Mr. Worthington’s outspoken position on Guantánamo. They should have described his contribution to the reporting instead of listing him as co-author, and noted that he had a point of view. Link

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

2 Comments

  1. Posted February 10, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    Remember everyone: Points of view are bad!

  2. Chris
    Posted February 10, 2008 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    Hasn’t anyone living in Times’ layers of editors ever heard of this new-fangled invention called Google?

    Points of view are fine, but they generally belong on the opinion page, not on the front page as “objective news reporting.”

    Too bad Worthington was only “under contract” with the NYT. If he was an actual day-to-day employee like, say, Linda Greenhouse, he’d be able to get away with this kind of thing all the time.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.