Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS

Gawker spotted this incredible error/correction in the Columbia Spectator, a student newspaper:

The paper subsequently retracted the piece. This text has replaced the article on the Spectator’s website:

Because this piece was based on unreliable sources we have decided to retract the article and remove it from the Web site. We appreciate all the letters we have received (one of which is printed in the 4/18/08 issue) and deeply apologize for the error.

del.icio.us:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS digg:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS newsvine:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS furl:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS reddit:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS fark:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS Y!:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS smarking:Columbia Spectator retracts article that claimed a Dalai Lama had AIDS

3 Comments

  1. Charlene
    Posted April 21, 2008 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    “One” Dalai Lama? There is only one Dalai Lama at a time, and there has only been one alive since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. How do you reach age eighteen without knowing that?

  2. Charlene
    Posted April 21, 2008 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    I mean the original writer, not you!

  3. odintooth
    Posted April 23, 2008 at 6:04 pm | Permalink

    The original writer was probably thinking of Ösel Tendzin, dharma heir of Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche. To add to the confusion, the similarly named Tenzin Ösel Rinpoche was recognized by the current Dalai Lama as the reincarnation of a completely different Tibetan lama.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*