Busy, not lousy

An error in the typesetting process meant the Green Island Art Group’s report in last week’s Star referred to 2007 as a “lousy” year for the club. The year was, in fact, “busy” for club members. Link

Thanks, Geoffrey!

This entry was written by Craig Silverman, posted on March 14, 2008 at 8:00 am, filed under Newspapers and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
del.icio.us:Busy, not lousy digg:Busy, not lousy newsvine:Busy, not lousy furl:Busy, not lousy reddit:Busy, not lousy fark:Busy, not lousy Y!:Busy, not lousy smarking:Busy, not lousy

One Comment

  1. Ali Turnbull
    Posted March 15, 2008 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    ‘Lousy’ for ‘busy’ looks like a case of ‘keming’ - see Ironic Sans - the result of improper kerning.

    http://www.ironicsans.com/2008/02/idea_a_new_typography_term.html

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*