An article in the Arts & Leisure section last Sunday about the No Music Day campaign in Britain included several incorrect references to Muzak, the company that sells prerecorded background music.
Muzak is not distributed in the United Kingdom, and lobbying groups there are not protesting the company; they are against piped music. Many musicians there oppose piped music; all practicing musicians do not “tend to despise Muzak.” The pianist and conductor Daniel Barenboim joined in the protests last year, but he did not angrily denounce Muzak. A group leading the campaign, Pipedown International, is against all forms of background music; it has not been campaigning against Muzak for 15 years. And a bill currently in Parliament and promoted by Pipedown seeks to ban piped music; it does not call for banning Muzak in hospitals. Link
-
Editor
Accuracy Sites
Broadcast Corrections
Magazine Corrections
Newspaper Corrections
- Akron Beacon Journal
- Albany Times Union
- Arizona Daily Star
- Arizona Republic
- Asbury Park Press
- Associated Press
- Atlanta Journal-Constitution
- Austin American-Statesman
- Austin Chronicle
- Baltimore Sun
- Bangor Daily News
- Boston Globe
- Buffalo News
- Cape Cod Times
- Charleston Gazette
- Chicago Tribune
- Christian Science Monitor
- Cleveland Plain Dealer
- Columbus Dispatch
- Contra Costa Times
- Dallas Morning News
- Daytona Beach News-Journal
- East Valley Tribune
- Fort Worth Star-Telegram
- Fresno Bee
- Globe And Mail
- Greensboro News & Record
- Hartford Courant
- Honolulu Advertiser
- Houston Chronicle
- International Herald Tribune
- Kent State Stater
- Los Angeles Times
- Mail & Guardian (South Africa)
- Miami Herald
- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
- Minneapolis Star Tribune
- Minnesota Daily
- Mirror (UK)
- Monterey County Herald
- National Post
- New Orleans Times-Picayune
- New York Times
- Newsday
- Northwest Herald
- Orange County Register
- Orlando Sentinel
- Philadelphia Inquirer
- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
- Portland Press Herald
- Raleigh News & Observer
- Reuters
- Rocky Mountain News
- Sacramento Bee
- Salt Lake Tribune
- San Antonio Express-News
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Sarasota Herald-Tribune
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer
- Seattle Times
- South Florida Sun-Sentinel
- St. Louis Post-Dispatch
- St. Petersburg Times
- Tampa Tribune
- The Gazette (Montreal)
- The Guardian
- The Independent (UK)
- The Oregonian
- Toronto Star
- U of Virginia Cavalier Daily
- Victoria Advocate (Texas)
- Virginian-Pilot
- Wall Street Journal
- Washington Post
- Washington Times
- Wichita Eagle
- Winston-Salem Journal
- Worcester Telegram & Gazette
Online Corrections
-












4 Comments
Rest is fine, then? :-)
Isn’t saying “all practicing musicians do not ‘tend to despise Muzak.’” the same as saying “No practising musician tends to despise Muzak”? If so, then the correction’s wrong.
Yes, Baylink, rest is fine indeed!
Stumblng: I believe they were trying to cast the correction in the same grammatical frame as the original; hence the tortured phrasing.