<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please forward to the previous resident</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/07/15/please-forward-to-the-previous-resident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/07/15/please-forward-to-the-previous-resident/</link>
	<description>Mistakes Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon P. Hemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/07/15/please-forward-to-the-previous-resident/comment-page-1/#comment-23133</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon P. Hemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=8600#comment-23133</guid>
		<description>I noticed similar information in a copy of my 2009â€“2010 local phonebook yesterday. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that it clearly notes that the information was as of a November, 2008, date that was after the election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you&#039;re publishing a new phonebook for a year after a nationwide election, wouldn&#039;t you included the updated information about newly-elected officials?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed similar information in a copy of my 2009â€“2010 local phonebook yesterday. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that it clearly notes that the information was as of a November, 2008, date that was after the election.</p>
<p>If you&#39;re publishing a new phonebook for a year after a nationwide election, wouldn&#39;t you included the updated information about newly-elected officials?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GPHemsley</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/07/15/please-forward-to-the-previous-resident/comment-page-1/#comment-22582</link>
		<dc:creator>GPHemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=8600#comment-22582</guid>
		<description>I noticed similar information in a copy of my 2009â€“2010 local phonebook yesterday. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that it clearly notes that the information was as of a November, 2008, date that was after the election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you&#039;re publishing a new phonebook for a year after a nationwide election, wouldn&#039;t you included the updated information about newly-elected officials?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed similar information in a copy of my 2009â€“2010 local phonebook yesterday. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that it clearly notes that the information was as of a November, 2008, date that was after the election.</p>
<p>If you&#39;re publishing a new phonebook for a year after a nationwide election, wouldn&#39;t you included the updated information about newly-elected officials?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

