Comments on: Fact checking needs to be saved before it can become a marketing tool http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/13/fact-checking-needs-to-be-saved-before-it-can-become-a-marketing-tool/ Mistakes Happen Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:43:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Yours, The Fact-Checking Dept. http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/13/fact-checking-needs-to-be-saved-before-it-can-become-a-marketing-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-23195 Yours, The Fact-Checking Dept. Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:29:12 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7590#comment-23195 "I would argue that substantively checking all editorial content should be the benchmark." <br><br>OK, but you can't argue that unless you actually define what constitutes a "substantive" fact-check. Talk about an argument lacking _substance_. “I would argue that substantively checking all editorial content should be the benchmark.”

OK, but you can't argue that unless you actually define what constitutes a “substantive” fact-check. Talk about an argument lacking _substance_.

]]> By: Yours, The Fact-Checking Dept. http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/13/fact-checking-needs-to-be-saved-before-it-can-become-a-marketing-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-23657 Yours, The Fact-Checking Dept. Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:27:00 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7590#comment-23657 "I would argue that substantively checking all editorial content should be the benchmark." OK, but you can't argue that unless you actually define what constitutes a "substantive" fact-check. Talk about an argument lacking _substance_. “I would argue that substantively checking all editorial content should be the benchmark.”

OK, but you can’t argue that unless you actually define what constitutes a “substantive” fact-check. Talk about an argument lacking _substance_.

]]> By: Yours, The Fact-Checking Dept. http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/13/fact-checking-needs-to-be-saved-before-it-can-become-a-marketing-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-22313 Yours, The Fact-Checking Dept. Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:29:12 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7590#comment-22313 "I would argue that substantively checking all editorial content should be the benchmark." <br><br>OK, but you can't argue that unless you actually define what constitutes a "substantive" fact-check. Talk about an argument lacking _substance_. “I would argue that substantively checking all editorial content should be the benchmark.”

OK, but you can't argue that unless you actually define what constitutes a “substantive” fact-check. Talk about an argument lacking _substance_.

]]>