http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/10/wsj-earns-an-f-in-student-demonstrations/ Mistakes Happen Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:43:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/10/wsj-earns-an-f-in-student-demonstrations/comment-page-1/#comment-23214 CraigSilverman Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:09:05 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7545#comment-23214 Yes, it's relatively common. A paper will often correct factual errors in published letters, and it appears as though the WSJ considered this characterization to be a factual error. Yes, it's relatively common. A paper will often correct factual errors in published letters, and it appears as though the WSJ considered this characterization to be a factual error.

]]> http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/10/wsj-earns-an-f-in-student-demonstrations/comment-page-1/#comment-23213 jeff Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:34:33 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7545#comment-23213 Do papers typically issue corrections of how a letter to the editor characterized something? Do papers typically issue corrections of how a letter to the editor characterized something?

]]> http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/10/wsj-earns-an-f-in-student-demonstrations/comment-page-1/#comment-22309 CraigSilverman Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:09:05 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7545#comment-22309 Yes, it's relatively common. A paper will often correct factual errors in published letters, and it appears as though the WSJ considered this characterization to be a factual error. Yes, it's relatively common. A paper will often correct factual errors in published letters, and it appears as though the WSJ considered this characterization to be a factual error.

]]> http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/03/10/wsj-earns-an-f-in-student-demonstrations/comment-page-1/#comment-22308 jeff Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:34:33 +0000 http://www.regrettheerror.com/?p=7545#comment-22308 Do papers typically issue corrections of how a letter to the editor characterized something? Do papers typically issue corrections of how a letter to the editor characterized something?

]]>