<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/01/10/apology-48/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/01/10/apology-48/</link>
	<description>Mistakes Happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaphan</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/01/10/apology-48/comment-page-1/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaphan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/apology-48#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>Paul Keating was the prime minister of Australia, not its head of state, which was, and still is, Queen Elizabeth II.  That&#039;s the problem with the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Keating was the prime minister of Australia, not its head of state, which was, and still is, Queen Elizabeth II.  That&#8217;s the problem with the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter F. Goolpacy</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2008/01/10/apology-48/comment-page-1/#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter F. Goolpacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regrettheerror.com/newspapers/apology-48#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>This retraction doesn&#039;t come close meeting the ingredients of a &quot;perfect aplogy&quot;, and no doubt did more harm than good. On a scale of 1-10, this one deserves a 2/10.

In fact most of the archived &quot;apologies&quot; cited throughout this site would receive failing grades.

PFG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This retraction doesn&#8217;t come close meeting the ingredients of a &#8220;perfect aplogy&#8221;, and no doubt did more harm than good. On a scale of 1-10, this one deserves a 2/10.</p>
<p>In fact most of the archived &#8220;apologies&#8221; cited throughout this site would receive failing grades.</p>
<p>PFG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

